: HOW DOES DURKHEIM DISTINGUISH HIS SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD FROM THE METHODOLOGY OF PSYCHOLOGYIntroductionThis seeks to answer the hashish out and analyze how does Durkheim distinguish his sociological method from the methodological analysis of psychological cognizance . This will evaluate the dry land of his claim on the basis of evidence availableAnalysis and DiscussionMeyer (1999 ) is his essay An canvas in the Philosophy of neighborly Science has quoted Durkheim s attempted jargon note of Sociological method and methodology of Psychology in terms of what as to what constitutes mixer man . The author focus of introducing the judgment has a background on his philosophical interrogative on whether scientific knowledge accords mankind . The requirement of candor according to Meyer (1999 ) is verifiable by persons wi th fitting ability forrader a field of study is to be considered a science . Meyer (1999 ) then made connection with Durkheim s specialization of his sociological methodology and the methodology of psychology as to the concept of kindly detailThe affectionate occurrence thence is our framework for explaining and analyzing the distinction . Meyer (1999 ) said , In Chapter 1 of his The Rules of Sociological Method he states two criteria for identifying kindly f sours . Firstly A social fact is to be recognize by the cause of outside irresistible impulse which it exercises or is fitting of exercising over individuals , and the presence of this power whitethorn be recognized in its turn all by the existence of somewhat specific sanction or by the resistance offered against every individual effort to loot it (Durkhiem ,.10 ) agree to this definition , gloominess is a social fact , since it coerces individuals to delay on the ground and resists their attempts to fly by their give nascency efforts At the end o! f Chapter 1 he restates this as A social fact is every way of acting - adequate to(p) of exercising on the individual an external boundt (Durkhiem ,.13Meyer (1999 ) argued that since gravity is not a way of acting this excludes gravity .
He therefore inferred that presumably is must be battalion that acts and that a social fact would seem to be present whenever people act in such a way as to confine the actions of other people . He explained that people do so by virtue of occupying space since we cannot walk by dint of warm objects . He concluded what Durkheim mean that people constrain others by intention to be referring to customs , laws and traditions which individuals ignore at some riskCiting customs , laws and tradition as exerting constraint on individuals , Meyer (1999 ) appears agreeing with Durkheim . Wikipedia 2006 , get along affirmed this when it discussed the term saying , social facts atomic issue forth 18 the social structures and cultural averages and values that are external to , and autocratic of , actors (Ritzer 2000 :73 . Social facts would be represented by HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Social_norm \o Social norm social norms or HYPERLINK http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Social_ presentation \o Social institution social institutions within the incorporated conscience or collective representations , which is internalized by individuals as morals which...If you want to get a all-inclusive essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay , visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment